$1,300,000 and Change

Posted by SEA on January 28, 2012  •  Memorandum of Understanding  • 

N.B.: For ongoing coverage of the San Diego D.A.'s charges and indictments of SUHSD Board and Administration personnel, the SEA has set up a dedicated page here

January 28 MessageJan 28 update

SUHSD TEACHERS
UNITED
AGAINST CORRUPTION


Who   SUHSD teachers, librarians, nurses and speech pathologists
What   Attend Board of Trustees Meeting
When   Monday, January 30, 2012 5:30 P.M.
Where   Hilltop High School Gym
Why   Our students can't AFFORD a $1.3 million bailout for board members!

Dear Colleagues:

We know that you are busy and have little extra time in your schedule for yet another meeting; however, we need you to attend the next board of trustees meeting in order to show those that are watching that SEA members loudly and clearly denounce corruption in the Sweetwater Union High School District. Employees and community members have done their job exposing the illegal practices occurring in the district; reporters have done their job publicizing the acts of malfeasance; the DA’s office has done its job investigating and indicting; now, it is your job to advertise and attend the next meeting.

  • Flyers are available at the SEA office for distribution in the community. Pass them out to parents before and after school. Pass them out to neighbors.
  • Buttons stating "Stop Corruption: Save Sweetwater" are available from your site reps. Wear them proudly.
  • Colleagues are planning to attend the meeting and speak out to all who will listen. Join them, or better yet tell your own story about how this corruption hurts your students.

Become part of the grassroots movement that is saving our district. Let the public know that the arrogant business as usual in our district must cease. The time for taking back our schools is long overdue. Board members WILL vote on whether to pay for the legal fees for Ricasa, Quinones, Sandoval, and Lopez. How could your students benefit from the 1.3 million dollars that it will take to fund their criminal defense? Please join us in declaring "Enough is enough" on January 30, 2012.


Melanie Morton and Helena Farias   co-chairs of SEA's organizing committee

Obsolete Extended Day Language

Posted by SEA on December 28, 2011  •  Memorandum of Understanding  • 

July 29 MessageDec 28 update

 

Dear SEA Members,

When our contracts are printed for the current one year agreement, there is a section that has language that is obsolete. Article 37.8, Extended Day, was a two-year pilot program which we negotiated with the District several years ago. The District does not have an interest in continuing the pilot or making the program permanent.

At most 7-12 school sites, credit recovery extends outside the regular student day. The pilot included a pro-rata-per-diem rate of pay for this type of work. A pro-rata-per-diem rate basically breaks down placement on the salary schedule to an hourly rate. We do have an Extended Day rate in our contract which is less than pro-rata-per-diem for most bargaining unit members. For example, the Extended Day rate is less the than pro-rata-per-diem rate for Class 1 (Bachelor’s Degree plus one year experience), step 5. It is also less than the pro-rata-per-diem rate for a teacher at Class 2, Step 4.

It was the District’s idea to offer us pro-rata-per-diem. They wanted to pay us more than the Extended Day rate. We agreed to allow them to pay pro-rata-per-diem for our professional services. We also included class size language in the pilot.

Why did the District approach us with this offer? They were having a difficult time finding individuals to teach credit recovery for the extended day rate. The District wanted to ensure that students met middle school promotion requirements and high school graduation requirements. The pilot worked.

At this point, the District believes that they are not having issues recruiting teachers to teach at the Extended Day rate. I am hearing otherwise. In order to recruit an active member of a subject matter department to teach credit recovery at his or her school site, the pro-rata-per-diem rate is the best way to go.

The SEA Board of Directors discussed this issue at our last meeting. We are not suggesting a boycott to bring the District back to the table on this issue. However, we do want to make sure that our membership understands that the pro-rata-per-diem rate of pay is not the same as Extended Day rate of pay. For most individuals, it is a drop in pay for professional services rendered.


Alex Anguiano   SEA President

 

Charting Charters

Posted by SEA on December 28, 2011  •  Memorandum of Understanding  • 

July 29 MessageOctober 17 update

 

Dear SEA Members,

The November 14th school board meeting was certainly interesting.

I have not seen emotions run as high since we gave our former superintendent the boot at a school board meeting at Southwest High, a school in the community of Nestor. Close to sixty members of the public completed speaker cards. Several of our librarians spoke about the work that they do and how library services promote life-long reading. Our PE teachers were also there. They spoke about new standards and how PE has evolved. What they are asking for is smaller class sizes in order for them to be more effective educators so they may have a greater impact on our students. I was there to request a copy of the Vega Report and to suggest that Jim Cartmill, Arlie Ricasa, and John McCann resign their School Board seats because our District tampered with the last school board race.

However, most of the audience, including those that had to stand outside because the room reached its capacity, were parents, teachers, and students from K-8 charter schools that feed into our District. They were there to discuss their upcoming exclusion from our District's "Compact for Success" and exclusion from participating in our middle school athletic programs. Of this group, by far, most were from my children's school.

Full disclosure here: Two of my children attend a charter school: The Nestor Language Academy Charter School. They have been at Nestor since kindergarten, before it became a charter.

My children are receiving a good education at Nestor. I like the school. It is a dependent charter and the teachers are CTA members. My daughter's teacher is a former student of mine. So is the principal. Now and then, I run into some of my former students there that are now parents. (Some are in their forties!) It was a good school before they became a charter and it still is. With the charter, the school gained the ability to serve 7th and 8th grade students, the same population served by SUHSD.

As a child, I attended Nestor Elementary. So did my brothers. My children were a part of the Language Academy at Nestor Elementary before it became a charter. Why? Two reasons:

  1. The Language Academy is good program.
  2. It is the closest elementary school to their home.

My son is now in the fifth grade. At this point, he does not desire to continue middle school at Nestor. I'm really careful about what I say about the Nestor program vs. Sweetwater programs, as I do not want my personal bias to influence his thinking in this area. Last year, he was thinking about Montgomery Middle. Now he is thinking of Mar Vista Middle and later wants to attend Mar Vista High School. That would be okay with me, but I also hope that he considers Southwest Middle and other options that are available to him, including my school, Hilltop. I want him to be exposed to options as we approach decision time.

Our District is saying that they are not being given access to sixth grade students at the K-8 charters like they once were. Therefore, our District feels that it has become necessary to become more aggressive in the student recruitment field. Our District has decided if we are not going to be allowed on charter campuses to describe our programs and to facilitate the transition to a new middle school, then we will pass out information outside the charter campuses. My son was a witness to Southwest Middle administrators, counselors, and students, passing out such information as he had safety patrol duty the afternoon of the first leafleting. I've heard that there were some arguments between the folks from Southwest Middle and some Nestor parents. If there were, I am requesting that we not fight in front of the children. Nevertheless, my son tells me that he did not observe any arguments-just discussions.

So if it is true - and I believe that it is - that SUHSD's access to sixth grade students attending K-8 charter schools has been limited, I want the practice to stop. SUHSD: You have an obligation to describe exactly how our access to sixth grade students has been limited. Make such a statement and disseminate it to us and the media. Be precise in your description. Charter school administrators: If access has been limited, is it fair to accuse SUHSD of being a bully? Like I said, I want my children exposed to information so that they/we can make a proper decision about their education.

On the Friday before the break, I took my children to the farmer's market in Imperial Beach. Teachers and administrators from Mar Vista Middle were distributing literature regarding their programs. I allowed them to speak to my son. They presented the information about their school without saying anything about Nestor. I liked that level of professionalism. Would I be okay with my son attending Mar Vista Middle? Absolutely. I believe that he would receive a fine education there. I also believe that Southwest Middle would be a good choice. When I visit Southwest Middle, I find the staff to be professional and the culture of the school to be, like Nestor, nurturing.

Our District did a poor job of facilitating the November 14th school board meeting. Speakers who had prepared three minute speeches were limited to one minute. The School Board continues to announce a start time of 6:00 pm and then walks away into closed session for an unspecified amount of time, leaving the community confused. Although, I disagree with some of the points that were made by our K-8 charter school community members, I don't like the way they were treated at the school board meeting. John McCann: The president of the school board runs the school board meeting. Learn how to run a meeting and stop treating the community poorly at school board meetings.

As for me, I believe that we run good schools. I also believe that any school can improve. District: If you really want to be competitive, listen to the teachers who work at the sites.

In the Media on this issue:


Alex Anguiano   SEA President

The Vega Report

Posted by SEA on November 18, 2011  •  Memorandum of Understanding  • 

July 29 MessageOctober 17 update

 

Dear SEA Members,

[Update (11/18/11): SUHSD Board Prompted for Report on Scott Alevy's Work]

The Vega Report has been submitted. The District has refused to provide me with a copy. They are also refusing to provide the DA with a copy unless if they are subpoenaed to do so. If Jim, Arlie, and John, cannot be transparent, perhaps it’s time for them to step down.

What is the Vega Report?

In the last round of negotiations, the District hired two PR firms to assist them with bargaining. The use of these firms was not publicly approved at a school board meeting. Instead, the District's former chief legal counsel was given the authority to hire these consulting firms to help them to gather information on SEA and to spin a tale that would help them to meet their bargaining objectives. The invoices submitted by one of the firms, Alevy Communications, became public knowledge and contributed to the downfall of our former superintendent. The bills indicate that the Alevy Communications went beyond assisting the District in negotiations.

The invoices indicated that the District paid Alevy Communications for assisting the former superintendent to write editorials to help with his family's troubles in Texas. More shocking was the fact that the bills indicate that the District participated in determining the results of the last school board race. According to the bills, Alevy Communications charged our District for meeting with school board candidate John McCann during his campaign. The District paid for Alevy Communications to have discussions with "Key Influencers" and to meet with a "Key Group" regarding the election. Alevy Communications was also paid to monitor the election on election night and to produce reports.

At one school board meeting I asked the following questions:

  1. Does the School Board find it acceptable to have our superintendent's editorial responses to the media written by Alevy Communications rather than by him?
  2. In light of this recent fiasco, will Alevy Communications continue to edit the District's publication called "Table Talk" that is distributed to SEA members?
  3. Who were the former (or current) teachers described in the bill?
  4. Who sanctioned the interview of a school board member of another district?
  5. Where did Dr. Gandara have this conversation with Mr. Alevy? Was Dr. Gandara being paid his salary on this day?
  6. What exactly was the District's involvement in the last School Board election? Arlie and Jim, are you prepared to do the right thing?
  7. How will you hold Dr. Gandara responsible for this latest scandal? I suggest that you dismiss him. Do you realize that he has lost his credibility and that his only source of authority comes from ruling by fear?

Jesus Gandara is gone. Good riddance. However, the bigger story of the District's involvement in the last election has been swept under the rug. If the Alevy Invoices are accurate, the District meddled in the last election and Jim, Arlie, and John should resign immediately so that we can move forward.

The District decided to audit the invoices. At the cost of fifteen thousand dollars, they hired former U.S. Attorney Greg Vega to perform the audit. The report has been submitted. I would like to see it and share it with the SEA membership. It should be an interesting read.

However, keep in mind that the person that the District hired to perform the audit, is the same person "who brokered the contract between the general counsel and the Sweetwater Union High School District" according to this UT article.

The invoices were processed by the Finance Department. Instead of disciplining the former head of this department for either the lack of oversight or worse, why has she been rewarded with a consulting position with our District? In some cases, unfortunately, not doing the right thing does pay.

District: What are you trying to hide? How about a little transparency?

[Update (11/18/11): SUHSD Board Prompted for Report on Scott Alevy's Work]


Alex Anguiano   SEA President